fbf5ce 32628fb392b34781989bdbd71c972cf7 mv2

Unreal Engine 5 vs Unity: Fees Battle 2023!

The current landscape of game development offers an exciting opportunity, with powerful game engines available at accessible price points, catering to both indie developers and large studios. These engines enable the creation of immersive gaming worlds that captivate players and keep them engaged. Two prominent contenders in this field are Unity and Unreal Engine, known for spawning titles like Gears of War, Bioshock, and Fortnite. For novice and experienced game developers, choosing between these platforms can be a daunting task as they embark on their journey to bring their game concepts to life.

But fear not, as we’re here to pit these software giants against each other in a comprehensive comparison to help you determine which platform suits your needs best as you venture into the realm of game creation. Who will emerge victorious? Read on to discover the answer.

Understanding Unity and Unreal Engine

Unity and Unreal Engine are both game engines, essential components in game development that unify various elements like sound, graphics, and AI within the game framework. They provide a software development environment to facilitate game design for a wide range of platforms, including PCs, consoles (such as Xbox, Wii, and PS4), and mobile devices, including iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, Linux, and more.

Their core functionalities encompass:

  • A rendering engine for 2D and 3D graphics
  • Physics engines for movement control
  • Sound integration
  • Scripting capabilities
  • Animation tools
  • AI development
  • Networking support
  • Streaming capabilities
  • Memory management
  • VR tools
  • Support for both 2D and 3D games

These game engines are indispensable for constructing functional games across various devices, emphasizing the importance of selecting the right one for your development journey.

Key Distinctions Between Unity and Unreal Engine

The initial distinction between Unity and Unreal Engine lies in their native programming languages. Unity employs C# throughout, both within the Unity editor and additional plugins, while Unreal Engine utilizes C++ alongside Blueprint, a proprietary language unique to Epic products when creating game code.

However, further disparities exist within each platform’s interface, which we will dissect in our comprehensive head-to-head comparison.

In-Depth Comparison

Let’s delve into the showdown between these programs, evaluating their performance in key categories:

Ease of Use

  • Winner: Unity

Why: Unity’s native C# language and intuitive workspace layout make it slightly more user-friendly compared to Unreal Engine, which presents a steeper learning curve.

Visual Effects (VFX) Quality

  • Winner: Unreal Engine

Why: Unreal Engine excels in VFX quality, offering photorealistic visualizations and the ability to incorporate high-quality assets, making it the preferred choice for breathtaking visual effects.


  • Winner: Unreal Engine

Why: Unreal Engine’s rendering speed and quality slightly surpass Unity’s, delivering industry-leading results that users consistently appreciate.


  • Winner: Unreal Engine

Why: Unreal Engine stands out in animation quality, leveraging its powerful rendering capabilities and top-notch visual effects to offer exceptional animation tools and renderings.

Team Collaboration

  • Winner: Unity

Why: With a larger market share, Unity boasts a broader community, making it easier to find collaborators compared to Unreal Engine.


  • Winner: Tie

Why: Both platforms offer robust scripting tools to facilitate end-to-end game scripting.

Quality of Support

  • Winner: Tie

Why: Both Unity and Unreal Engine offer 24/7 support services, ensuring a seamless experience for developers.

G2 Rating

  • Winner: Tie

Why: G2, a trusted source for software reviews, rates both Unity and Unreal Engine at 4.5/5 stars, underscoring their popularity and quality.

Capterra Rating

  • Winner: Unreal Engine

Why: Unreal Engine receives a perfect 5/5 stars on Capterra, while Unity falls slightly below with 4.5/5 stars.


  • Unity: Unity offers a free version, but unlocking its full functionality requires a Pro version subscription priced at $75 per month.
  • Unreal Engine: Unreal Engine is free to use, with a 5% royalty fee on game sales after release.

Target Audience for Unity and Unreal Engine

  • Unity: Ideal for indie game designers who prefer a familiar programming language (C#) and want to start creating games without sharing royalties with the platform.
  • Unreal Engine: Suited for enterprise-level game developers and indie developers who prioritize top-notch graphics and fast rendering, and are comfortable with a royalty-based model.

Final Considerations

Ultimately, both Unity and Unreal Engine empower developers to create visually appealing and functional games. Your choice should depend on several factors:

  • Your familiarity with the programming language (C# vs. C++/Blueprint).
  • Your budget, considering upfront costs and potential royalties.
  • The speed of processing and rendering required for your projects.

Remember that personal preference plays a role, and it’s often better to start creating and see what works for you rather than overthinking the details.

If you’re seeking enhanced collaboration for your remote game development team, consider Evercast, a platform that facilitates HD streaming of edit sessions while enabling video chatting and note exchange, all within a single platform. Collaboration is crucial for crafting the next gaming masterpiece.

Unity, the technology company renowned for its popular game development engine, is striving to elucidate the details of a recent pricing adjustment for its services. This announcement, made on a Tuesday morning, provoked widespread frustration within the game development community.

Why it’s significant: These fees, which Unity claims are vital to support the ongoing development of its technology, raised concerns among game developers about whether achieving success with Unity would result in costs exceeding their potential earnings.

Throughout the day, developers contemplated postponing their game releases in favor of switching to competing platforms like Epic Games’ Unreal Engine or other options. Unity executive Marc Whitten later provided updates on these policies in the evening, potentially alleviating some of the concerns expressed by game creators.

Key points: The newly introduced “Runtime Fee,” unveiled on Tuesday morning, is linked to the number of installations of a game, an aspect that previously incurred no charges for developers.

Under Unity’s new system, developers using the free tier of Unity’s development services would owe Unity $0.20 per installation once their game reached the thresholds of 200,000 downloads and $200,000 in revenue.

Developers subscribed to the Unity Pro plan, costing over $2,000 annually, would face different thresholds and lower fees.

The new fee structure is scheduled to commence in early 2024.

However, game developers on platforms like X expressed immediate discontent, fearing that any game experiencing a surge in installations due to events like sales, inclusion in charity bundles, or being featured in subscription services like Microsoft’s Game Pass, would trigger substantial Unity fees.

Innersloth, the development studio behind the popular game Among Us, voiced their concerns on Twitter, stating that these fees would not only affect them but also game studios of all sizes and budgets.

Another studio, Aggro Crab, called on Unity to reverse its plans, citing concerns that their upcoming game, set to be released to 25 million Game Pass subscribers, could potentially incur fees that threaten their business’s stability.

Notably, Unity faced challenges in clarifying and, in some cases, modifying its policies regarding these fees.

Zooming in: Initially, Unity indicated to Axios that reinstalling a game would result in multiple fees for developers. However, Unity’s Marc Whitten clarified later that the company would only charge for the initial installation, addressing concerns about “install-bombing,” where users could repeatedly install and uninstall a game to accumulate fees and harm developers. Nevertheless, an extra fee would apply if a user installed a game on a second device, such as a Steam Deck after installing it on a PC.

Additional details: Whitten also specified that runtime fees would not be imposed for game demo installations, unless the demo is part of a download that includes the full game. Games offered for charity or included in charity events would be exempt from these fees, and Unity would provide a mechanism for developers to notify Unity when their games are offered in this manner. In the case of Game Pass and other subscription services, Whitten explained that the fees are charged to distributors, meaning developers like Aggro Crab would not be financially responsible.

It’s worth noting that Whitten estimated that only around 10% of Unity’s developers would ultimately need to pay these fees, given the thresholds games must reach.

In Unity’s own words: “Our primary objective here is to ensure a fair value exchange, allowing us to continue investing in our core mission of providing the best tools for game creation. It’s never pleasant to receive a flurry of negative feedback in a single day, and we acknowledge the need for clarification on some of these points. We are attentive and committed to delivering the best possible experience.”

This statement emphasizes Unity’s dedication to addressing concerns and ensuring the best possible outcomes for its community of developers.

Who is affected by this price increase: The impact of this price adjustment is highly focused. In fact, it will not affect more than 90% of our customer base. Those customers who will be affected are typically those who have experienced significant growth in downloads and revenue, meeting both our installation and revenue thresholds. This implies that creators who have not yet achieved substantial success in terms of scale will either face minimal fees or none at all, while those who have will incur a reasonable one-time fee.

Fees applied exclusively to new installations: Once you have successfully met both the installation and revenue thresholds, the runtime fee will only be applicable to new installations made after January 1, 2024. It’s important to note that this fee is not perpetual; it is a one-time charge for each installation, and it does not follow the ongoing royalty model commonly associated with revenue-sharing systems.


Definition and counting of installations: Assuming that the installation and revenue thresholds have been satisfied, we will solely consider net new installations on any device starting from January 1, 2024. Additionally, developers will not be responsible for paying a runtime fee in the following cases:

  • Re-installations: No fees will be imposed for reinstalling applications.
  • Fraudulent installations: Fees will not be applied to installations suspected of fraud or malicious intent, and we will collaborate directly with you to address cases of fraud or botnet activity.
  • Trials, partial play demos, and automation installations (devops): These types of installations, as well as early access games (excluding demos), will not be included in the installation count.
  • Web and streaming games: Installations of web and streaming games will not be factored into your installation count.
  • Charity-related installations: The pricing adjustment and installation count will not be applied to charity bundles or initiatives you may be involved in.

Don’t forget to check more in the Tech section.

Similar Posts